meta 01 augmented reality glasses

Meta is a successful Kickstarter project that claims to be making “the most advanced augmented reality glasses.” Now that the Kickstarter is over, the glasses have become available for pre-order directly through the Meta website. The unit is expected to be delivered starting in November 2013.

The Meta Kickstarter ran its course for 30 days, between May 17th and June 16th. The Kickstarter campaign nearly doubled their goal, finishing at $194,444.

Now that the Kickstarter has ended, Meta is now offering direct pre-ordering of the Meta 01 developer kit through their website for $667. According to the company, the glasses combine a head-mounted depth camera with a see-through QHD display which uses beam-splitting technology:

  • Twin 960×540 see through TFT LCD displays at 23 degrees Field of View, via HDMI
  • 720p RGB camera via USB
  • 320×240 Infrared Depth Camera via USB
  • “9 degree” of freedom sensor (3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, 3-axis compass) via USB [quotes added by me]

The depth camera is used to captured the wearer’s hands as input, allowing them to manipulate on-screen content by reaching out and (visually) touching it. The company also says that the depth camera uses time-of-flight technology, similar to that found in the forthcoming Kinect 2.0, which is said to significantly reduce latency over other methods.

SEE ALSO
Adobe's Project Aero Aims to Help Creators Build AR Content

The company lists a few early augmented reality games and applications that they say will come with the Meta 01 developer kit:

  • Chess
  • 3D Sculpt+Print Tool, in partnership with Game Draw 3D
  • Laser Tag
  • Voxel Editor
  • MetaCraft, a MineCraft simulator

The company recently released a new concept video for the Meta augmented reality glasses:

Meta differs substantially from Google Glass, the latter being more akin to ‘data glasses’ than augmented reality glasses.

While the Meta project looks a bit rough around the edges, the company has significantly bolstered their creditiblity by bringing on board Professor Steve Mann as their Chief Scientist and Professor Steve Feiner as their Lead Advisor. Both are highly respected in the fields of augmented reality and wearable computing.

This article may contain affiliate links. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product we may receive a small commission which helps support the publication. See here for more information.


  • Barry Low

    I’d be interested in hearing if anyone has tried out this hardware or even spoken with someone who has. I originally supported the Meta Kickstarter, but backed out due to lack of feedback and obvious graphical shine making it too good to be true. Being a part of the Oculus Rift campaign has given me a better understanding in the hardware limitations, technical availability, and other issues — the transparency of the development however left me hopeful and understanding to their future when delivery occurred; as opposed to the disappointment that I’m afraid the Meta may be delivering. Of course I’ll be thrilled to be wrong.

  • Mateus Zica

    It would be great if it work the way it is shown in videos.
    But there is 2 thing im very skeptical :

    1- Track system : Hadrware and software
    The software/hardware to track the hands, people, objects in the video appears to be from 2025, far more acurate than Kinect 2 or similiar Tracking sistens on the marketing . I dont think they will achieve this perfection in very short time (and remember, it have to be small and lightweight to be on top of the glass)
    ps: if they can do it, it would be a perfect solution for Oculus Rift (with a tracker mounted on it)

    2 – 3d rendering thru lens :
    The realism of the rendering of 3d thru the lens glasses in the video looks just as real as real life. But i think it would appear a little blurry like google glass. This will never as real as with the Rift for example.

    —————-
    Final thought :
    If some third party build a perfect hand tracking for the rift and also build HD cameras to get feedback of the real world and attach it to the Rift, the project above would be obsolete.

  • thePhi

    They have posted another video, testing their system, on their website and it seems to be a more realistic picture of what will be the final result.
    But quite appealing IMO though, if they polish that a bit!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oioSBP9XBNg

  • Aaron Rasmussen

    My main concern with the Meta is the FOV they’re showing in the concept videos, and the stated 23 degree FOV of the device. They may have a very interesting device, but it’ll be a guaranteed letdown based on that spec alone. It’s the Google Glass mistake all over again.

    • Ben Lang

      Agreed, the concept video shows stuff that’s still a long way off. I hope they aren’t setting people up for disappointment.

  • crim3

    I think people is not aware of the enormous challenge that AR is compared to VR. It’s basically the same unresolved problem that is holding up the appearance of autonomous robots. The core of the problem of an AR system is the *perception of the environment* so that synthetic data can be drawn over what the user sees in a *coherent* and seamless way. This implies the use of an artificial intelligence that is capable to *understand* the world we live in from the data of the sensors that are feeding the system (cameras, depth camera, laser scanner…) Some success can be achieved in very specific situations with strong constraints (same happens with robots).
    Compared to this challenge, making the AR goggles itself is piece of cake. But there won’t be a system generating AR content for those goggles in many, many years – even decades. At least not in the way we think about AR.

    • Mageoftheyear

      So true. Yet it is perceived as a “lighter” technological device simply because of it’s size – if anyone stopped to think about that statement they’d realise how ridiculous that sounds.