Palmer Luckey has been a virtual reality junkie since before the Oculus Rift. He claims to have the largest private collection of head mounted displays in the world, totaling some 43 units. And as the Rift has shown us, Luckey doesn’t just collect, he also builds. As such, he’s built a number of prototypes that push the field of view far beyond what the Rift will deliver — among them 120 degree and 270 degree HMDs.

For those unfamiliar, ‘field of view’ defines how much of the user’s vision is taken up by a display. Humans have a horizontal FoV of around 180 degrees. For a display to completely take over your view it would need to have a 180 degree FoV (or beyond). See more VR terms in my glossary. Higher fields of view are linked closely with the immersiveness of a head mounted display.

The Rift didn’t break any ground with a 90 degree horizontal field of view. In fact, there have been head mounted displays with larger fields of view for quite some time. The magic of the Oculus Rift is the combination of a fairly high FoV, low weight, low cost, and low latency latency in a single device. But what happens when you can disregard a few of those characteristics and really work at the pushing the field of view? Luckey gives us the answer with 120 degree and 270 degree prototypes.

This is Luckey’s 120 degree FoV prototype which he shared on the MTBS3D forums back in June before the Oculus Rift really took off. As you can see, it’s massive. He lists the specs as follows:

  • 120 degree horizontal FoV
  • 1280×720 per eye
  • Dual HDMI inputs
  • Super tight pixel pitch, no perceivable pixels
  • Minimal distortion optics
He also mentions the brightness of the display technology behind the optics is so great that watching a video of fireworks is “on par with what you see in real life”. Wow.

‘Head mounted display’ might not even be an appropriate term for such a beast — Luckey said this one was so heavy that we was going to mount it on a spring balanced boom to make it easy to look through.

The Name of Meta’s Next Quest Headset Likely Confirmed by Leak
Luckey was kind enough to send along this photo of the 270 degree HMD prototype in the middle of the build process.
Luckey was kind enough to send along this photo of the 270 degree HMD prototype in the middle of the build process.

Then there’s the 270 degree FoV prototype which pushes the field of view beyond that of regular human vision. Going to 270 degrees means that the user’s entire 180 degree FoV will be taken up by the display and then some. The display adds on an additional 90 degrees outside of the user’s field of view which is visible if the user decides to look around the display. Luckey says that even if you turn your eyes all the way to one side you still can’t see the edges of the screen. Talk about immersion!

This large unit demonstrates the challenge of mounting big head mounted display with high field of view.

Weight and bulk aren’t the only issues with Luckey’s 270 degree prototype; it’s even difficult to get computer software to correctly render such a wide FoV. Luckey says that four separate views of the digital scene need to be rendered then fused together to create a scene which looks correct through the 270 degree prototype. Not only is there no widespread driver support for such rendering, the demand on the computer to accomplish such a task is prohibitively high. For stereoscopic 3D display, a computer already needs to render twice as many frames as non-3D. To play a game in 3D at a smooth 30 frames per second the computer needs to render a separate frame for each eye, essentially meaning it must be capable of rendering at 60 FPS. Now add the four independent views necessary to achieve a 270 degree FoV — to each eye. At this point the computer must be capable of rending at 300 FPS which is not a trivial task.

All of this bodes well for the upcoming consumer version of the Rift (AKA the Oculus Rift 2.0) which Luckey hopes will be able to go beyond the 90 degree FoV of the developer version. I think it’s safe to say that 270 degrees is out of the question on rendering alone but 120 degrees might just be a possibility.

Newsletter graphic

This article may contain affiliate links. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product we may receive a small commission which helps support the publication. More information.

Ben is the world's most senior professional analyst solely dedicated to the XR industry, having founded Road to VR in 2011—a year before the Oculus Kickstarter sparked a resurgence that led to the modern XR landscape. He has authored more than 3,000 articles chronicling the evolution of the XR industry over more than a decade. With that unique perspective, Ben has been consistently recognized as one of the most influential voices in XR, giving keynotes and joining panel and podcast discussions at key industry events. He is a self-described "journalist and analyst, not evangelist."
  • william epps

    Oculus Rift: an OPEN SOURCE project for kickstarter. How come no one is talking about how things are no longer open source, someone lied.

    • Peter Koch

      To be fair, for the first couple of SDK releases they did publish all the source code. I Think as they grew it was reasonable to change that policy.

      • T3hWhiteHorse

        Mhm, too change as we grow is not hypocritical.

        • Neel Gupta

          To change business model after accepting funds, is hypocritical !

  • Bruce

    Surely Nvidia’s simultaneous multi-projection technology is just what these large field of view prototypes needs. For that “widespread driver support for multiple viewports” that Lucky was talking about. I.e. we have it now.

    • Dave

      Your kidding! You do realise that this article was written in 2012.

  • Joe Holliday

    120 fov shouldn’t be difficult. There are phone based VR headsets on Amazon advertising 120 degree FOV.