Quest Pro has finally been revealed and we were lucky enough to be among the first to get a hands-on demo with this interesting new standalone VR MR headset.

Update (October 25th, 2022): Quest Pro releases today—our review unit arrived quite late and we’re still in the process of giving it a full evaluation. In the meantime we’re revisiting our initial impressions of the headset from earlier this month. Stay tuned for our full Quest Pro review.

We’ve always called Quest 2 a VR headset. Because, while it has gained some passthrough AR capabilities since launch, it was still clearly far better at VR than AR—and most of its actual usage reflects that.

Key Quest Pro Coverage:

Quest Pro Revealed – Full Specs, Price, & Release Date

Quest Pro Technical Analysis – What’s Promising & What’s Not

Touch Pro Controllers Revealed – Also Compatible with Quest 2

Quest Pro, on the other hand, is the first headset from Meta that warrants being called a mixed reality headset—it’s fully capable of VR, AR, or any combination between.

That’s largely thanks to new sensors on the headset which provide a sharper passthrough view that’s also finally full-color and a more accurate representation of the world around you. And with an ‘open’ peripheral design to keep your virtual view connected to the real world, Quest Pro is really opening the door to serious AR experiences. But it will be some time yet before developers discover what’s truly compelling with this kind of AR.

In a recent visit to Meta’s offices to check out Quest Pro for myself, the company ran me through a handful of demos. Compared to the usual VR demo—where I put on the headset and the developers outside turn into mere voices from another plane—I could put on Quest Pro nearly without an interruption in our conversation. That’s because once I put on the headset I saw a reasonably high resolution representation of the real world around me that felt real enough that I could easily keep chatting as if there wasn’t a slab of technology between my eyes and theirs.

Photo by Road to VR

Though it felt like I was still standing there next to them, now that the headset was on, I could suddenly manifest bits of the virtual world before me. Compared to the various transparent AR headsets I’ve tried previously, the wider field-of-view and fully opaque virtual objects around me felt far more solid and ‘there’ in the room with me, though this comes with the not insignificant tradeoff of reducing the resolution of the real world.

It’s clear that Quest Pro’s MR capabilities are powerful… but it’s going to be a while yet before the industry at large understands where and why to use AR, VR, or a combination of the two when presented with one device that flexibly provides all of those options.

New Quest Update Adds More Vision Pro Features & Passthrough Improvements

Most of the app demos I saw naturally benefited from the use of MR simply by allowing me to feel like I didn’t completely leave the room the moment I put on the headset. That makes ‘simple’ apps more appealing, like Painting VR which essentially lets you pop up a painting studio in the room you’re in. With passthrough AR you can even arrange your virtual workspace around you real room, working around obstacles and even placing virtual brushes on a real table. It’s a nice novelty, but I not an essential addition to the app.

And that’s the case with most of the Quest Pro demos I’ve seen so far. Essentially you’re getting a reasonably high resolution passthrough background under your VR app, which makes you feel a little more at home for apps that don’t benefit from taking you completely out of the real world.

Photo by Road to VR

It’s early though, and developers haven’t yet had much time to plumb the headset’s new capabilities and form-factor to figure out exactly what they will do best. Over time I expect everyone will start to understand where to lean into AR for specific apps, and where to lean into VR.

But Quest Pro isn’t just Quest 2 with passthrough. In addition to being significantly more compact, Quest Pro also understands much more about you.

Photo by Road to VR

Thanks to internal cameras watching your eyes and face, the headset is capable of giving your avatar more realistic expressions that clearly move the bar in terms of natural-feeling social interactions in VR.

Using the new sensors, the headset creates a model of your face—it’s not just your eyes and your mouth moving, but whole expressions. Meta has created an impressively well rigged model—that will be available to developers—that moves your cheeks, nose, and brow.

Although Meta’s avatars look better with this new tech underneath, the company also showed me the potential of the headset’s face-tracking when more resources are poured into fidelity. In the demo, my own facial expressions were driving a fantasy avatar, and the result was very impressive. The spectrum of expressions covered and the way the skin appeared to naturally bunch up around the nose, eyes, and forehead was very impressive.

Of course, even though it was my face driving the avatar’s expressions, it wasn’t me. The expressions looked plausibly real… but whether or not they look specific to you (even when using your own avatar), is something I haven’t been able to determine yet. That’ll have to wait until I can see someone I know very well on the other side of an avatar using Quest Pro.

– – — – –

All-in-all, Quest Pro is something of a canvas… and a pretty good one at that. It has the kind of capabilities that we’d ultimately like to see in a pair of all-day sunglasses 10 years from now. To that end, it’s no wonder that Meta has priced and positioned the headset more for professional users, as those are the most immediate and clear use-cases for these new capabilities.

For VR gamers there’s not much about their current VR experience that Quest Pro would change right out of the box, other than some apps gaining a better passthrough background. Not to mention that gamers can add Touch Pro controllers to Quest 2 without buying the entire headset.

Further out, it looks like Meta’s plan is to find out which technologies from Quest Pro should trickle down into a future Quest 3 at the same time as incubating new and interesting MR apps for the whole Quest ecosystem.

Newsletter graphic

This article may contain affiliate links. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product we may receive a small commission which helps support the publication. More information.

Ben is the world's most senior professional analyst solely dedicated to the XR industry, having founded Road to VR in 2011—a year before the Oculus Kickstarter sparked a resurgence that led to the modern XR landscape. He has authored more than 3,000 articles chronicling the evolution of the XR industry over more than a decade. With that unique perspective, Ben has been consistently recognized as one of the most influential voices in XR, giving keynotes and joining panel and podcast discussions at key industry events. He is a self-described "journalist and analyst, not evangelist."
  • That facial tracking tech is really impressive, can’t wait to see it controlling some vrchat avatars! that’s the main feature that might make me drop all the money from my wallet and buy one, so cool!

    Just wish there was this much tech packed into a consumer headset, the day will come!

    • kontis

      can’t wait to see it controlling some vrchat avatars!

      You mean those bad low poly Quest avatars?

      This may end up being similarly PC-unfriendly feature as Quest’s hand tracking is, which means it could be difficult to use it on PC version of VRchat.
      Same may happen with their leg tracking/simulation.

      And that’s probably on purpose. I guess Meta wants you to have as many reasons to use Quest natively as possible…

      • ViRGiN

        Quest hand tracking is passed through to PC through air link, but sure, go ahead and tell us all for another year that valve supported “FuLL bOdY tRaCkInG” for years, yet you are never capable mentally and physically to even inform where does one find FBT SDK.

    • ViRGiN

      I wish it cost 1500 more so I can give my fanboy money to Meta. I need to keep some to buy some new Sony camera though.

  • eadVrim

    I think the Quest 3 will be fully VR and fully AR too, the Quest Pro is made specifically for devlopers so they focus on creating AR(XR) apps.
    That why the full light blocker is not included in the box.
    About XR (mixing VR and AR) I think it is the futur communication and social media.

  • Great hands-on article! I appreciated your hype-free view of it

  • Sven Viking

    The only advantage to the semi-demise of Microsoft’s VR hardware efforts is that use of the term “Mixed Reality headset” is almost 20% less confusing now.

  • g-man

    In addition to being significantly more compact, Quest Pro also understands much more about you

    And that’s why I will never wear a Meta product.

    • Anonymous

      Then perhaps you should stop using technologies at all. Caveman.

      • chad__

        Look at this moron, making fun of others refusing to give their rights away to a criminal organization.

  • ViRGiN

    I got two of them. One for my face. And one for my lower part.

    That was a better investment than my Gabe tattoo removal I think.

    • Gabe Zuckerwell

      Fake profile.

      • ViRGiN

        Oops, I used my second account by mistake.

  • Pyro2008

    What’s your definition of “reasonably high resolution” for AR?

    I have the Meta Quest Pro and AR seems like garbage. Guessing it has to be around 720p at best, with color now but also poorly done camera mapping that distorts and color shifts objects within a few feet (notably your own hands). I would barely put this as an upgrade from the Quest 2.

  • Israel Galindo

    I don’t know brother.. i bought one and i wasnt “impressed” like when i got the quest 2. 1. I cannot record passthrough or stream passthrough, 2. when inviting others to a passthrough experience, only YOU can see passthrough not the other players, and 3 when using it thethered, you can only use games that are quest 2 and not really passthrough games (yet i assume) .. not to sound like a downer but that was an expensive 1500 upgrade that really does not meet MY expectations (IMO)

  • Andross

    Not even two phrases about the new Pimax Crystal?